Friday, October 06, 2006
Why do NPR and Cheryl Corley think that whatever Newt Gingrich has to say about the Foley scandal has any news value? Why does National Public Radio think that what a disgraced ex-speaker who left congress under a cloud of scandal has any relevance to the scandal being slowly revealed today.
Why does NPR think that airing the completely non-factual speculations of disgraced, ex-speaker, under a cloud of ethical taint, Republican mouthpiece and known propagandist, Newt Gingrich that the fact based Foley scandal was a dirty trick brought by "Democrats and the media" to effect the November elections is anything but an attempt by Newt Gingrich and the rest of the Republican propaganda machine's attempt to cover up a major scandal in the Republican leadership of the congress?
Why does NPR think that airing the completely non-factual speculations of disgraced, ex-speaker, under a cloud of ethical taint, Republican mouthpiece and known propagandist, Newt Gingrich that the fact based Foley scandal was a dirty trick brought by "Democrats and the media" to effect the November elections is anything but an attempt by Newt Gingrich and the rest of the Republican propaganda machine's attempt to cover up a major scandal in the Republican leadership of the congress?
Comments:
<< Home
i think this gets to points made in your 'i'd rather be talking about iraq' post.
here's the thing, it's become so bad that i actually feel i get a better clue as to what's up with this administration by watching Fox. the propaganda is much clearer and easy to decipher.
Post a Comment
here's the thing, it's become so bad that i actually feel i get a better clue as to what's up with this administration by watching Fox. the propaganda is much clearer and easy to decipher.
# posted by 
: 6:22 AM
: 6:22 AM << Home
